The Use of Political Violence by ZANU PF: An Unsettling Reality
In a disconcerting revelation, the deployment of political violence by ZANU PF, a tactic to suppress opposition, persists as a distressingly familiar strategy. Despite its lamentable nature, statistical advantages lie within its grasp. Shockingly, according to a 2009 study by Collier & Hoeffler, politicians who resort to violence, alongside other illicit methods such as abductions, stand a staggering three times greater chance of retaining their positions in office compared to their untainted counterparts.
Recent events concerning the abduction of members from the CCC political party in Zimbabwe expose the glaring bias within the police, military, and the secretive Central Intelligence Organization (CIO). Moreover, the denial of the CCC’s request to hold a rally further demonstrates a manipulative electoral ploy. This strategy aims to diminish opposition voter turnout while minimally impacting ZANU PF’s own turnout. As Zimbabwe approaches its next election, the very foundation of our democratic environment appears increasingly unstable. Rather than fostering an atmosphere of inclusivity, the political landscape projects hostility, replete with threats that coerce voting choices and dampen enthusiasm for political assemblies.
Chamisa, the prominent leader of the opposition faction, exudes confidence reminiscent of the rising morning sun during his public addresses. However, lurking beneath his self-assured exterior are persistent doubts regarding his pledges to grant Zimbabweans a second era of independence. Recent events paint a concerning picture: CCC was denied a gathering space in Marondera, supporters faced brutal assaults in Gokwe, and the Binga rally was abruptly cancelled. The reason cited: inadequate police manpower due to President E. Mnangagwa’s impending appearance on the 17th. This glaring manipulation of events raises significant concerns about the fairness of the electoral process.
Tragically, the demise of Max Dutuma, a former CCC candidate for Ward 26 in Highfield West, epitomizes the dire threat to constitutional legitimacy and political democracy within Zimbabwe. His abduction by ZANU PF operatives and subsequent report of his death hours later underscores the extent to which these actions challenge the fabric of the nation. As a global theme and an integral component of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), youth political participation seeks to combat political apathy. Paradoxically, the targeting and elimination of promising political voices based on differing opinions obstructs the trajectory of multi-party democracy. A pertinent question emerges: How long will nationalist leaders go to extreme lengths to consolidate power and cultivate their political spheres? The manipulation of youth through inducements like drugs and the perpetuation of poverty as an externally imposed hindrance to progress showcase the failure of this approach.
Zimbabwe’s struggle with developmental inertia mirrors a broader African predicament. As the rest of the world embraces progressive change, political entities adhering to the archaic practice of ‘Hard & Dirty Politics’ hold back advancement through bloodshed and coercion. This approach, reminiscent of the Cold War era, contrasts starkly with the ‘Smart Politics’ employed by leading nations that prioritize competitive ideas as the bedrock of effective representation. The significance of this contrast is clear: Developmental projects shouldn’t materialize solely during election seasons; taxpayers deserve consistent, quality services. Political enticements, masquerading as aid, undermine genuine progress. Merit, not political affiliation, should determine employment. These critical socio-development issues weigh heavily on the minds of every citizen, family, and entrepreneur. This is the juncture where CCC’s relevance comes to the fore. The party’s commitment to addressing these concerns positions it as the antidote to the impending electoral rigging attempts by ZANU PF.