In the economic landscape of Zimbabwe, one name stands out: China. From vaccine distribution to power plant construction, China’s influence seems unassailable. This dominance extends even to questionable practices like exploiting local graves for coal. These economic activities, reminiscent of colonial-era tactics, should raise concerns among Zimbabweans. However, the ruling Zanu PF party seems to turn a blind eye due to its own interests.
After decades of Zanu PF’s tight grip on Zimbabwe, a shift is apparent – certain sectors are being touted as reserved for locals. Yet, this move is viewed by many as a mockery of the suffering population. Zanu PF lacks the legitimacy to genuinely implement reforms that benefit Zimbabweans due to its centralized power structure and disregard for the rule of law.
Zanu PF’s classification of menial jobs and small businesses as reserved for Zimbabweans is misleading. While they may seem strategic, they do little to uplift the nation. These token gestures are meant to project an image of a people-centric government ahead of the 2023 elections, diverting attention from years of neglect.
The reality is that Zimbabwe’s potential for high-level technology, research, and innovation has been hindered. Zanu PF’s failure to promote specialization in crucial fields, like vaccine development or advanced manufacturing, has led to heavy reliance on foreign sources, especially China. Instead of self-sufficiency, Zimbabwe remains dependent on outsiders for vital resources and technology.
This dependency extends to economics as well. Zanu PF’s allocation of supposedly “reserved” sectors is an attempt to appease the masses, while in reality, it perpetuates mediocrity and poverty. Without access to capital and specialized skills, the average citizen remains trapped in a cycle of economic subjugation.
Comparisons to the past highlight Zanu PF’s failings. During a fleeting era of Western-backed progress, the true opposition prioritized inclusivity and equal opportunities for all. Unlike Zanu PF’s current stance, which caters to foreign interests, the opposition championed a united Zimbabwean workforce.
The timing of Zanu PF’s “reserved” sectors announcement, closely tied to the upcoming elections, raises concerns about partisan favoritism. Past behavior suggests that these opportunities will be unevenly distributed, favoring Zanu PF loyalists. This would further marginalize those not aligned with the ruling party, perpetuating a cycle of exclusion.
Zimbabwe doesn’t need superficial economic reservations; it needs meaningful reforms that pave the way for a peaceful transition of power. Zanu PF’s true challenge lies in dismantling its own power stronghold and allowing a diverse, capable leadership to flourish. Only then can Zimbabwe free itself from the shadows of foreign dominance and move towards self-sufficiency and prosperity.