In a bold move that has stirred a nationwide controversy, Zimbabwe’s President Emmerson Mnangagwa recently inaugurated Deputy Prosecutor-General Michael Reza as the chair of the Zimbabwe Anti-Corruption Commission (Zacc), succeeding Justice Loice Matanda-Moyo, who has transitioned to the role of Prosecutor-General. This appointment has sparked significant public debate, raising concerns about the potential violation of the country’s constitution and the integrity of its anti-corruption efforts.

Zacc, which stands as a critical institution in Zimbabwe’s battle against corruption, now faces a pivotal moment. The agency, which was envisioned as a model of transparency and adherence to legal standards, is perceived as being undermined under Reza’s leadership. The core of the controversy lies in the allegations that Reza’s appointment blatantly disregards the constitutional mandates for such a critical position.

According to Zimbabwe’s constitution, any Zacc commissioner with a legal background must possess at least seven years of legal practice, be eligible for a judicial appointment, or have served as a High Court or Supreme Court judge. However, Reza, who only became registered to practice law in Zimbabwe between 2020 and 2021, has roughly three to four years of experience in this field. Despite his academic qualifications – an LLB degree from the University of South Africa and an LLM from Midlands State University – his actual legal practice falls short of the constitutional requirement for a Zacc commissioner, let alone for the chairperson.

The appointment was justified on the basis that a commissioner could be appointed after ten years in crime investigation. Yet, this interpretation has failed to assuage concerns, notably due to the absence of any other commissioner within ZACC who satisfies the seven-year legal practice criterion. This has led to doubts about the commission’s legal grounding and its capacity to operate effectively and credibly.

The divide over Reza’s appointment is profound. Some defend his qualifications citing his substantial experience in crime investigation. Conversely, detractors argue that despite his experience, he does not fulfill the legal criteria essential for his new position. Additionally, his involvement in various controversies, including accusations of persecuting opposition activists and leaders through legal channels and alleged involvements in corruption cases, further complicates his appointment.

This decision by President Mnangagwa poses serious questions about Zimbabwe’s commitment to upholding its constitution and maintaining the integrity of its institutions designed to combat corruption. Reza’s appointment, against the backdrop of these constitutional stipulations and amidst widespread public dissent, represents a significant moment for the nation. It challenges Zimbabwe’s resolve to effectively combat corruption and maintain the rule of law – key pillars for democratic governance and public trust.

As the country navigates through this contentious appointment, the international community along with the citizens of Zimbabwe are keenly observing. The resolution of this issue will not only impact the effectiveness of Zacc but will also influence the global perception of Zimbabwe’s dedication to transparency, legality, and a staunch stance against corruption. The unfolding of these events will undoubtedly be critical in shaping the nation’s future and its commitment to justice and rule of law.